The House Intelligence Committee and the Senate Judiciary Committee have just scored a major victory in their pursuit of uncovering the extent of criminality perpetrated by Hillary Clinton.
The Hill reports that both committees now have access to a witness to Hillary’s covering-up of her crimes, a witness that confesses that he, himself, carried out the destruction of her 2015 email archives.
The witness, who remains unnamed, claims that “the former secretary of State and her top aides transmitted classified information through her insecure private email server”.
More good news: Congress now has documents from within the FBI that state in bold print that the “’sheer volume’ of classified information that flowed through Clinton’s insecure emails” proves a dangerous extent of criminality.
These documents also purportedly claim that elements within the FBI were disturbed by the exoneration of Hillary Clinton by then-Director James Comey before any witnesses were interviewed.
Another nugget of interest emerged on January 2, in which it was learned that during the closed door Congressional hearing with Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, members “confirmed that the investigation and charging decisions were controlled by a small group in Washington headquarters rather the normal process of allowing field offices to investigate possible criminality in their localities. The Clinton email server in question was based in New York.”
For those arrogant sycophants in the media that laugh derisively at any mention of a Deep State (*wink, wink* CNN), how do you explain this development?
Republicans are now beginning to come together in the realization that the Deep State (in c/o the FBI) did actively and intentionally try to clear Hillary of wrong doing wo she could avoid political turbulence during the 2016 election, while Democrats called the FBI’s actions ‘unique’.
I guess that is the new liberal buzzword for ‘criminal’.